Last week, former premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) finally announced his bid to represent the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) in next year’s presidential election. The announcement came hardly as a surprise, with many viewing a stand-off between him and Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), who has temporarily stepped down as DPP chairperson, being inevitable.
What was surprising was former vice president Annette Lu’s (呂秀蓮) announcement that she was not joining the DPP presidential primary — shocking because she had declared early on her intention to stand and then withdrew on the eve of her expected announcement.
Unlike the DPP primary in 2008, the fight between the two main contenders today is expected to be more civil, as nobody wants to see a repeat of the clashes that characterized the previous campaign.
Some people think Tsai does not have a strong image on the national level and are concerned she might find it difficult to attract pan-green voters. Their concerns are unfounded. During the DPP primary in 2008, all of the newly established pro-independence factions rejected former premier Frank Hsieh (謝長廷), and many people thought that this would be his downfall. In the end, it was the party member vote that saved him. The pro-green electorate is concerned mostly with which candidate is strong enough to win the election. With the exception of a very small minority, most pan-green supporters have tired of the Taiwanese independence issue.
There are also those within the pan-green camp who are not happy with the new system this year — decided by the DPP’s National Congress in January — of selecting nominees through a public poll, with no party member vote. They have got it into their heads that the decision was tailor-made for Tsai, to give her the best chance of winning. This betrays a misunderstanding of the facts. Tsai had already been voted in as chairperson of the party twice, each time with an overwhelming number of votes. DPP members and pan-green supporters have high hopes for Tsai and hope that she will be able to lead the party back into government. If the primary was conducted as a party member ballot, she would be the most likely winner.
It would have been very difficult for Tsai to have reached her current position had the DPP won the presidency in 2008. However, disillusioned by allegations of corruption against the DPP, the electorate turned their back on the party. For the pro-green electorate, the politicians at the time had revealed themselves to be flawed, and it was looking for someone untainted and unassociated with that generation of politicians to lead the party forward and divest it of its sullied reputation. Tsai fitted this image and pro-green voters warmed to her.
When Tsai became chairpersonship, her first challenge was how to deal with the hard-core supporters of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁). They wanted Tsai to throw the full weight of the party behind Chen, but she would only support him on humanitarian grounds, stopping short of getting involved in the legal proceedings. Her refusal to pander to the demands of the pro-Chen faction meant that her status as DPP chief was rather tenuous. Fortunately, public discontent with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government led to a string of resounding victories for the DPP in several legislative by-elections, shoring up her status. In the end even Chen gave her his approval, meaning that his supporters became better disposed to her.
Getting the various forces within the party behind her was one thing; her next challenge is the pro-blue supporters. Hostile to the DPP, it stands to reason that they would be similarly hostile to its chairperson. National polls, then, will not be particularly kind to Tsai. Su, meanwhile, seems to have avoided the ire of various forces, both within and outside the party.
The reason that Su was able to rate among the 10 most popular politicians at the national level after the 2008 presidential election was that he was canny enough to retreat from the thick of things. This kept him out of the post-election internal squabbles, and when the pro-Chen supporters were laying siege to Tsai, he managed to stay out of the mudslinging between the pro and anti-Chen factions. He has also softened his line, neutralizing some of the bile aimed at him from pan-blue quarters.
Quite a few people in the pan-green camp believe that the DPP primary will be a one-horse race, and regard a Tsai victory as a fait accompli. This conclusion is a tad premature. If the nomination were to be decided by a party member vote, Tsai may well have won with a resounding majority. However, as it is to be done via a popular vote, she could fall foul of votes by pro-blue supporters hostile to the DPP chairperson, conditioned by years of enmity between the DPP and the KMT. The three main pro-KMT newspapers, too, seem to have it in for Tsai, and many political commentators have joined their ranks.
Chen Mao-hsiung is chairman of the Society for the Promotion of Taiwanese Security.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS